Skip to content

Cost data

Why do link building agencies not publish their pricing?

Eight of the twelve agencies we document publish no rate at all. Some of the reasons are perfectly sound. Here is how to tell which is which, and how to price anyway.

Last updated · Figures are third-party published data, cited inline

The short answer

Most link building agencies do not publish pricing because per-link costs genuinely vary from $141 to over $1,500 depending on target site authority, your category and your customer lifetime value. That is a legitimate reason. It becomes a problem only when it is used to price against your budget rather than the work.

Eight of the twelve agencies documented on this site publish no pricing at all. That ratio is normal for this market, and it is the single biggest reason buying links feels harder than it should.

Before treating it as evasion, it is worth separating the legitimate reasons from the ones that should make you cautious.

The legitimate reasons

The product genuinely varies by a factor of ten. A link insertion runs about $141. A digital PR placement runs $800–$1,200. Both are sold as “a link”. An agency that published one number would be publishing a misleading one.

Category difficulty changes the work. Placing links for a project management tool and placing them for a gambling affiliate are not the same job. 61.0% of surveyed SEOs named gambling as requiring the largest budgets — the same agency doing the same activity spends very differently across categories.

Lifetime value pricing is standard and defensible. Agencies price against what a customer is worth to you: $800–$1,000+ per link above $12,000 LTV, $600–$800 between $7,000 and $12,000. Publishing a single rate would mean overcharging one segment or undercharging another.

Publisher costs are not fixed. Placement fees rose 20–40% in two years. A published rate card would be out of date within a quarter.

The less legitimate reason

Private pricing also allows an agency to price against your budget rather than against the work. If the first substantive question on a discovery call is what you are currently spending — before anything about your category, your target pages or your competitors — you are being scoped for willingness to pay.

That is not fraud, and plenty of professional services work this way. But it does mean the number you are quoted is partly a function of what you revealed, which is a good argument for knowing the market bands before the call and for being vague about your ceiling until you have a quote.

How to price a proposal without a rate card

Convert everything to cost per link with inclusions. A $6,000 retainer for 10 links is $600 a link. Then establish whether that $600 includes content, monitoring and vetting, or just placement. Two proposals at $600 can be very different products.

Compare against the published bands. $508.95 is the market average for a high-quality backlink. Editorial placements sit at $500–$1,250. If a quote lands far outside that, ask what accounts for it — there may be a good answer.

Ask the same eleven questions of everyone. Identical questions produce comparable answers, which is the thing this market is missing. The list is here.

Use the four that publish as reference points. Editorial.Link at $350 a link with no minimum, uSERP at $500–$1,000, Dofollow at $4,000 a month for four to five links, Digital Olympus at $500–$900 with a $40,000 programme minimum. Those numbers give you a defensible frame for judging any private quote.

What to do on the call

Ask for a per-link cost and the inclusions, in that order. If an agency will not give you a number after a proper discussion of your requirements, that is a different situation from not publishing one on a website — and it is reasonable to say so and move on.

Work out what your budget buys at market rates first with the cost calculator, then take the comparison table into the conversation.

Questions

Is it a red flag if an agency will not publish prices?

No. It is the market norm — eight of the twelve agencies we document publish nothing, and the underlying reason is real: per-link costs range from $141 to over $1,500 depending on the site. It becomes a red flag only if they also will not give you a number after understanding your requirements.

How do I compare agencies that all quote privately?

Convert every proposal to a cost per link with the inclusions listed, then compare that against the published market bands. Ask all of them the same eleven questions in the same order so the answers are comparable.

Which link building agencies publish their pricing?

Four of the twelve we document publish a rate or a minimum, ranging from $350 per link with no minimum contract to a $40,000 programme minimum. The comparison table lists the current figures with sources.

Work out what this should cost you

Three inputs, published market bands, a number in thirty seconds. No email required to see the result.

+1 (772) 255-9010 Price a retainer